- #Please revert back to me if you have any concerns how to#
- #Please revert back to me if you have any concerns code#
- #Please revert back to me if you have any concerns password#
- #Please revert back to me if you have any concerns license#
Originally posted by of Totoro Yes I can play offline but she can't do the opposite.
#Please revert back to me if you have any concerns how to#
This doesn't want to be offensive, I'm just saying that Valve knows how to deal with such request in legal way, IT way and whatever other way is required.
#Please revert back to me if you have any concerns license#
One note, I know Valve license is for one account, but I request a change in general, if it needs to be changed at legal layers too, Valve knows definitely better than me.
I hope they don't expect to sell multiple copies per household!) That being said, for developers there is no workaround such thing since in any case people living in the same home will still be able to share the entire account if needed (and it's reasonable honestly. Obviously I can see how family view can impact them ALREADY, but I don't see how such a change would actually impact them DIFFERENTLY from how they are already impacted. I don't see how developers can see this policy impacting them, since players can already do this. That would be noisy enough for abusers not to do that, while being ok for real families.
#Please revert back to me if you have any concerns code#
I suggest instead to just allow this behavior, but request to the library owner a code (if he's online and playing) like the two-factor authentication every time she wants to play a game. So there are multiple workarounds which don't involve anything. Not only that, but you can even workaround the system by disconnecting (with firewall or unplugging the cable) of steam on my wife computer, while keeping my online, and we can both play on the same library. I'm honestly even fine with an IP check while we are both online: family share is meant for the same household, so that shouldn't be a problem for whoever is using the system fairly. I'm also surprised of this decision since if I'm offline and she's online, she can play but if we are both online, she can't. So for example if I want to play an online game, either I can't or she can't play my games. I consider this really important, especially once we have kids, it seems very unreasonable for me to buy 400+ games for me + wife + of Totoro Yes I can play offline but she can't do the opposite. It's quite important honestly because we are bored of swapping back to the other account.Īnd it doesn't impact selling, just makes customer happier. So please, improve the system, make sure that family view stops working only if we play the SAME GAME, not if we play games from our shared library. We can't play the same game, but we sure can play different games at same time. This should reflect reality: we own 2 "consoles" (2 PCs) and we are supposed to have a giant DVD libraries which is steam. Now, I can understand the logic behind the family view limitation, but it's not correct.
#Please revert back to me if you have any concerns password#
And I have no troubles giving her my password for obvious reasons. This is plain stupid for people really living in the same home: I can join into my account on her computer, set steam to offline and we can both play at different games. However there is one big downer: I can't play any games of my library without kicking her out.
We love family sharing, she can play Ori while I'm working. Howver my gaming libraries is much bigger than hers (I'm addicted to Steam). So, me and my wife both love playing videogames.
0 kommentar(er)
